• Gold M - Skip to Main Content.
  • University of Minnesota
  • Search U of M
  • CSE Home
  • IT Home
  • Directories
  • One Stop
  • myU
Computer Science & Engineering
Prospective Students
Current Students
Alumni
Industry

Computer Science & Engineering

  • Department Info
    • About Us
    • Contact Info
    • Department News
    • Giving
  •  
  • Admissions
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
  •  
  • Academics
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
  •  
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Graduate Students
  •  
  • Research
    • Research Areas
    • Tech Reports
    • Related Centers
  •  
  • Resources
    • Forms
    • Systems Help
    • Faculty Portal locked external link
    • Computing Facilities
    • Department Wiki locked external link
    • Employment
  •  
  • Site Map
  •  
  •  
Institute of Technology Logo
Home > Research > Tech Reports
Browse reports by year:
[ ALL 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 ]
Browse report authors:
[ ALL A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z ]
Browse reports by title:
[ ALL A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z ]

University of Minnesota - Computer Science and Engineering Technical Report Abstract

Internal models for object manipulation: Determining optimal contact locations

Report Number: 06-003
Date of Submission: 2/13/2006

Authors:
   
   

View Report:
   PDF format

Abstract:

Although there are an infinite number of ways that humans can lift an object, they tend to reach in a predictable manner. This suggests that people are aware of, and optimizing, some sort of loss function. This paper outlines a natural loss function that may be used to predict people's actions in everyday reaching tasks. The loss function is based on the physics of object manipulation and the assumption that people are planning for the intended motion of the object. Using this framework, we are able to make predictions about how people should reach if they are minimizing their expected risk. To test the model, we required people to reach to objects at varying orientations. Our experimental results indicate that people are reaching in a manner that minimizes their expected risk for the task. These findings suggest that people planning for the intended motion of the object and that our brain is aware of the physics involved with object manipulation.

Related Links

  • U of M Research centers and institutes
  • Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program
  • Experts@Minnesota
  • Office of Graduate School Outreach
  • IT Faculty & research
  • Colloquia
  • Talks

 

  • ©2006 - 2009 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy
  • Contact U of M
  • Contact CSE
  • CSE Employment
  • Site Map
  • The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
  • Last modified on July 23, 2008