|
TITLE: | What is special about mining spatial datasets? |
|
PRESENTER: | Shashi Shekhar : Biography , Homepage |
|
AFFILIATION: | Computer Science Department, University of Minnesota. |
|
URL: | http://www.cs.umn.edu/~shekhar |
SLIDES:
Classical data mining techniques often perform poorly when applied to spatial data sets because of the following reasons. First, spatial data is embedded in a continuous space, whereas classical datasets are often discrete. Second, spatial patterns are often local where as classical data mining techniques often focus on global patterns. Finally, one of the common assumptions in classical statistical analysis is that data samples are independently generated. When it comes to the analysis of spatial data, however, the assumption about the independence of samples is generally false because spatial data tends to be highly self correlated. For example, people with similar characteristics, occupation and background tend to cluster together in the same neighborhoods. In spatial statistics this tendency is called spatial autocorrelation. Ignoring spatial autocorrelation when analyzing data with spatial characteristics may produce hypotheses or models that are inaccurate or inconsistent with the data set.
Thus new methods are needed to analyze spatial data to detect spatial patterns. This talk surveys some of the new methods including those for discovering spatial co-locations, detecting spatial outliers and location prediction.
KEYWORDS: Spatial Datasets, Auto-correlation, Spatial data mining.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, the National Geo-spatial Intelligence Agency, the U.S. Army (Topological Engineering Center and Army Research Lab.), the Federal Highway Autority, and the University of Minnesota (e.g. Center for Transportation Studies).
NOTE: Some of the results discussed in this talk appeared in the following publications: